Reco & John's 婚紗照
Check them out...story comes next...
2008年8月24日 星期日
2008年8月18日 星期一
偶常常想發飆
偶常常想發飆
常常有些事讓偶超想發飆，偶說的是工作上，生活上有約翰偶還蠻開心的，舉例如下。
1. 找不到人：偶跟偶的team 分在不同的辦公室，加上偶在不同的辦公室跑來跑去，如果IM, email 或是分機跟手機都找不到，偶就會快發飆了。
2. 找不到時間去上廁所：一直開會又走不開，終於等到可以去上廁所，途中又被攔截談一下，終於到了廁所也要一面上一面跟外面洗手的說話。天啊~~~老娘難道都沒有清靜的時間嗎？難怪偶以前在新加坡 hp office 看到 executive toilet，真的太需要了。
3. 都 deal down 了，老煩偶：有些policy 或是 guideline，已經都各方溝通後沒有任何 issue 了，就是有人喜歡又從頭問為什麼要這麼做，你不煩偶都快發飆了。舉例來說：搬家！決定都下了，是吵以前怎樣有用嗎，look front not look back...業績起不來這些人都有責任。火大！
4. 老愛當好人：台灣外商主管不知哪根筋不對，老愛當好人，come on...coaching makes improvement and succeed, being a good man cannot push to next level
5. 在員工面前不說實話：就有這種主管，跟員工打績效都說很好，反過來跟偶抱怨員工怎樣又怎樣。come on...就跟員工說實話啊~~~
6. 講了又講，都聽不懂：在決策公佈之前，就已經 individual 溝通過了，公佈之後還一直反悔一直問同樣的問題，真是的 get over with...
7. 跟A 說偶說這樣，跟偶說A說這樣：想在中間得利，賤！
生3胞胎 Chanel 要n個？
生3胞胎 Chanel 要n個？
約翰跟瑞可去新光三越挑婚戒 順便看一下偶老妹
瑞可說：親愛的~偶最近看影集(Lipstick Jungle, Cashmere Mafia...etc) 說女人一生一定要有一個Chanel 如果偶生男生 要買一個Chanel 給偶喔？
約翰說：沒問題啊~如果生女兒呢？
瑞可說：那要2個Chanel
約翰說：如果雙胞胎呢？
瑞可還沒說話 約翰又說：如果三胞胎呢？
瑞可說：那就不要買了 把錢存起來 偶們的苦日子要開始了
約翰說：一個人各抱一個 腳上還有一個 天啊~~~
2008年8月4日 星期一
Happy Birthday---My lion friends
Happy Birthday---My lion friends
Dear Iven, Ze-Ting, Hank, Liz, Claire Chan & Professor Uen,
Happy Birthday to you, I love lions...
 |
pic from BlueMountain http://www.bluemountain.com/display.pd?prodnum=3101117&path=100102
2008年7月30日 星期三
Sex and the City
Sex and the City
最近從eMule download Sex and the City 共六季 整各卯起來看 最喜歡第六季 因為衣服超多首飾超好看還有狠帥的史密斯 花哈哈哈約翰最喜歡的Charlotte 這件馬甲超好看
約翰也超喜歡的Samantha 和偶喜歡的Smith
想借去看了嗎~親愛滴
超想要這條珍珠手鍊
親愛滴~生日快樂喔
2008年7月28日 星期一
Sakura...看起來像黑店的按摩店
Sakura...看起來像黑店的按摩店
話說主管T 老闆對偶超級照顧 所以在他周遊列國出差前就送了價值5000台票的禮卷 請偶跟約翰去按摩放鬆一下
偶跟約翰到了之後 兩各人都呆住了 這...這家店跟中山北路的風格粉像耶~約翰說的~還說即使不是中山北路也一定開過店在中山北...
Anyway, 偶們兩各想說進去後會不會出現一各狀況是 美女說：先生，費用一共是50000，帥哥約翰說：可是按摩不是1200 嘛~美女說：對的~其他的收費是因為我是您的按摩師ㄚ
後來看了以下的介紹確定不是做黑的，加上我們家的 Sales Ops manager Jean 的保證，這周末應該會去試一試。約翰還得寫篇報告給T老闆，因為T老闆自己可是沒去過喔。
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/shockho/12572433
2008年7月26日 星期六
P.S. I Love You---I don't get it, Snap!!!
Snaps is a party game. At least two people must be familiar with the game: the others (spectators) are challenged to discover the "secret" and then participate.
The spectators secretly tell one of the players (we'll call him the "sender") a word, phrase, person/place/thing - anything that is fairly well-known and not too long. The sender then tells the receiver (the other person who is "in the know"), "Snaps is the name of the game and the name of the games is snaps", and begins to "send". The sender then uses a code to communicate the secret word or phrase to the receiver. Once the receiver knows what it is, he tells the spectators.
Here's the code:
The sender spells the word or phrase as follows: Every phrase the sender says after saying, "Snaps is the name of the game and the name of the games is snaps" is part of the message - the first letter of each thing said spells out the secret word or phrase.
Except for vowels - they are communicated by the sender snapping his fingers. A is one snap, E is two, I is three, O is four, U is five snaps.
If done quickly and with practice, this game is bewildering to the spectators, and the receiver will know the word or phrase without having seemed to get enough info from the sender.
For example, if the secret word were "George Washington", the sender may say the following:
"Snaps is the name of the game and the name of the games is snaps"
"Give me a second" (G)
(snap twice) (E)
(snap four times) (O)
"Ready?" (R)
"Got it yet?" (G)
(snap twice) (E)
"Wait a second" (W)
(snap once) (A)
and so on.
Generally the receiver can guess the word or phrase before all the letters are given, further bewildering the spectators. Once a spectator thinks he knows the secret, he can attempt to either send or receive, thus either proving or disproving that he has discovered the secret.
Another variation:
If a spectator gets wise and gives the sender a difficult word, like one starting with an "X", or something that may be difficult to send without giving away the code, the sender can begin by saying, "Snaps is NOT the name of the game", and that tells the receiver that the word that will be spelled is NOT the word he has to guess, but rather a clue to what the word is. For example, to send ZEBRA in this way, the sender might spell out, "black striped horse", and avoid having to send the letter "Z".
The spectators secretly tell one of the players (we'll call him the "sender") a word, phrase, person/place/thing - anything that is fairly well-known and not too long. The sender then tells the receiver (the other person who is "in the know"), "Snaps is the name of the game and the name of the games is snaps", and begins to "send". The sender then uses a code to communicate the secret word or phrase to the receiver. Once the receiver knows what it is, he tells the spectators.
Here's the code:
The sender spells the word or phrase as follows: Every phrase the sender says after saying, "Snaps is the name of the game and the name of the games is snaps" is part of the message - the first letter of each thing said spells out the secret word or phrase.
Except for vowels - they are communicated by the sender snapping his fingers. A is one snap, E is two, I is three, O is four, U is five snaps.
If done quickly and with practice, this game is bewildering to the spectators, and the receiver will know the word or phrase without having seemed to get enough info from the sender.
For example, if the secret word were "George Washington", the sender may say the following:
"Snaps is the name of the game and the name of the games is snaps"
"Give me a second" (G)
(snap twice) (E)
(snap four times) (O)
"Ready?" (R)
"Got it yet?" (G)
(snap twice) (E)
"Wait a second" (W)
(snap once) (A)
and so on.
Generally the receiver can guess the word or phrase before all the letters are given, further bewildering the spectators. Once a spectator thinks he knows the secret, he can attempt to either send or receive, thus either proving or disproving that he has discovered the secret.
Another variation:
If a spectator gets wise and gives the sender a difficult word, like one starting with an "X", or something that may be difficult to send without giving away the code, the sender can begin by saying, "Snaps is NOT the name of the game", and that tells the receiver that the word that will be spelled is NOT the word he has to guess, but rather a clue to what the word is. For example, to send ZEBRA in this way, the sender might spell out, "black striped horse", and avoid having to send the letter "Z".
2008年6月22日 星期日
2008年6月11日 星期三
Performance Review 的迷思
Performance Review 的迷思
Q1: 我的team 都表現的非常好，之所以必須放比較低的 tier 是因為HR 強迫 distribution 的分布
Q2: Coaching 和 improvement plan 會讓我的員工morale 降低
Q3: 我很忙沒有空替員工設目標，我老闆都沒幫我設目標，我怎麼往下設？
Q4: 為什麼一定要做 performance review 呢？我的員工跟我反應調薪不公平，HR 妳告訴我該怎麼辦？
Q5: 反正這個員工要離開公司就放最低的 tier 吧
這些問題很眼熟吧，妳會如何回應呢？
2008年6月8日 星期日
benchstrength---板凳深度
Benchstrength---板凳深度
最近常常聽到 Corp. HR 在討論這個 topic，起因是目前公司正在進行 Succession Planning，因此各個 Business Unit 都開始 set up benchstrength。
我就不在此討論敝公司的做法，以下為一些分享，大家可以看一看囉，happy learning!
- Rothwell與Poduch (2004)強調，接班人計畫並非只是找到特定職位的替代人選，而是更積極地，發展人才以及建立強而有力的板凳深度(bench strength)
- Benchstrength.com http://www.benchstrength.com.au/index.htm
- Building benchstrength is a myth http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/workforce-performance/building-bench-strength-is-a-myth/
- 執行力：板凳深度 http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/jw!YkxlH.qBAQUiz_ZZvWNxSg--/article?mid=151 這篇寫得粉透徹喔
親愛低溫教授~我們來成立HR 知識交流網啦~~~您的生日會就是座談會，您覺得呢？
訂閱：
文章 (Atom)
